Online dating and social media make it easy to meet new people — and for minors to misrepresent their age. If that deception leads to sexual activity, can the adult still face charges? In Ohio, sometimes yes — and sometimes no, depending on the statute. Read the distinctions below, then call our Dayton sex crimes attorney who handles these cases.
Ohio’s Age of Consent (and What It Actually Means)
The age of consent in Ohio is 16. Sexual conduct with someone under 16 can be charged, but for the common charge — Unlawful Sexual Conduct with a Minor (R.C. 2907.04) — the State must prove the adult knew the person was 13–15 or was reckless about that fact. A reasonable, good-faith mistake about age (no recklessness) can defeat that element.
Separate statutes criminalize other situations even when a person is 16-17 — for example, Sexual Battery (R.C. 2907.03) when the adult is a teacher, coach, or otherwise in a position of authority over the minor.
The Hard Line: Under 13
For rape of a child under 13 (R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b)), age is strict: the statute applies “whether or not the offender knows the age of the other person”. A mistake-of-age claim does not help there.
If you’re facing charges related to sexual crimes with minors or need guidance on this serious matter, contact us immediately for a free consultation. Protect your rights today.
If a Minor Lies About Their Age
- Under 16 (R.C. 2907.04): Deception by the minor can matter because the State still has to prove you knew or were reckless regarding age. Evidence showing you reasonably believed they were 16+ (and you weren’t reckless) can defeat the charge.
- Under 13 (R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b)): Deception doesn’t matter. If sexual conduct with a child under 13 is proved, the age element is met.
- 16–17 with authority/position cases (R.C. 2907.03): Even truthful age doesn’t save it; the relationship itself makes the conduct criminal.
Online Interactions, “Sexting”, and Images
Ohio’s child-image crimes are severe and technical. R.C. 2907.323 (illegal use of a minor in nudity-oriented material) broadly criminalizes creating/possessing nudity-oriented material of a minor, with limited exceptions; do not assume that “they said they were 18” is a safe harbor. Facts, content, and the exact statute matter. Get counsel before talking to the police.
Defense Themes We Pursue
- Element attack (2907.04): No knowledge and no recklessness re: age; reasonable reliance on representations; surrounding circumstances consistent with 16+.
- Charge sorting: If the facts don’t fit 2907.02/2907.03/2907.04, push back on overcharging and pursue the correct (or no) charge consistent with the statutes.
- Digital-evidence hygiene: Preserve messages, profiles, platform age-gates, IDs, and third-party witnesses quickly.
Talk to Our Experienced Lawyer Now
Accusations in these cases move fast and carry life-changing consequences. Even a brief conversation or online exchange can be used against you — and the law’s distinctions are not always intuitive. Don’t guess or try to explain your side alone. Our experienced defense lawyer can assess the facts, preserve critical digital evidence, and protect your rights from the start.
We defend clients across the Dayton area in cases under R.C. 2907.02, 2907.03, 2907.04, and 2907.323.
Contact our criminal defense attorneys today to schedule your free case review and start protecting your future.
